Breakthroughs in the Course of Jewellery Making

If this topic interests you, be sure to read the complete article found at http://moreintelligentlife.com/content/arts/isabel-lloyd/history-making

HISTORY IN THE MAKING

Where technology goes, design follows. Isabel Lloyd pinpoints some of the breakthroughs that changed the course of jewellery…

From INTELLIGENT LIFE magazine, November/December 2012

In many ways, jewellery is the most limited of arts. Precious stones and metals are unreliable, recalcitrant base materials with only a few, often nannyish ways of getting them to do the thing you want. The objects you make mustn’t be too heavy, unwieldy or scratchy, but they have to be sturdy: as in engineering, all the bits have to stick together. So when the engineers, as they occasionally do, come up with a new way of building, cue much excitement. Designs change, fashions change, even entire markets change.

Take the cultured pearl. In 1905, after decades of experiment and a couple of fairly major setbacks—killer algae, the death of his wife—a Japanese noodle-salesman called Kokichi Mikimoto finally worked out how to prod oysters into making properly round pearls on demand. An industry that had been virtually fished-out leapt back into life, throwing out little balls of nacre like popcorn; the classic string of pearls moved from the preserve of grande dames of the Belle Epoque (when, weight for weight, they cost more than diamonds) to the neck of your average aspirational housewife. Pearl glut duly led to pearl boredom, which jewellers tried to counter by promoting some often only dubiously attractive colours. But it also gave them more raw material to play with: if you want Big Pearls, you can have them.

Jewellers are magpies. They nick ideas to feather their nests. So with lost-wax casting—what Geoffrey Munn, of the jewellery dealers Wartski, calls “an honourable technique of sculpting, which migrated into jewellery”. No one knows when the migration, or nicking, began: there are pieces of Asante gold millennia old, cast from beetles. But it’s easy enough to spot jewellery made this way. It’ll have a sculptural quality, and perhaps some obviously intricate surface detailing. That’s mostly down to the method, which involves carving a design in three dimensions—traditionally in wax, though modern jewellers may use resin, foam or even 3D printers—covering it in plaster, then burning out or “losing” the wax over heat before filling the remaining plaster with molten metal. It’s hellishly tricky, though. Even the great 16th-century goldsmith Benvenuto Cellini, maker of a stupendous sculpted golden salt cellar, is on record moaning about the difficulties of casting heads.

Specific techniques seem to lead jewellers towards similar uses. The glossy surface of early enamel, like icing on a golden cake, was often used in religious icons, perhaps because it looked so obviously everlasting, with a kind of holy impermeability. But once flux—the addition of borax—was discovered in the ninth century, the medium flowed more satisfactorily across surfaces and into tight spaces, and enamellers abandoned religion for the tinier, more colourful corners of the natural world: the sheen of a flower’s petal, the shimmer of a dragonfly’s wings. The exception was Fabergé’s beloved guilloché—his own invention of pouring translucent enamel over engraved gold—which instead mimicked the effect of moiré silk, a furnishing fabric used to gussy up walls and chairs. Hence his famous, if rather pointless, eggs: jewellery for mantelpieces.

My own favourite technological breakthrough is all about accessibility. In the 18th century an Alsatian jeweller called Georg Strass began experimenting with the recipe for glass, mixing silica with high levels of lead oxide and additives such as potassium in a wet “paste” before firing. The results were unusually hard and clear, and could be cut, polished and backed with metal foil like real diamonds, at the time themselves backed with foil in an attempt to increase their glitter. But Strass’s paste was more malleable than diamond; his gems could be bigger, and cut to any shape, so they could be set very closely together. A Strass paste jewel gave you more sparkle per square inch, and per pound spent—just what the new industrial merchant class wanted. You could argue this was the beginning of the democratizing of jewellery, and its design: the unlimited palette of colours, the lightness and fluidity of the material, took the brakes off. As Carmen Busquets, who buys jewellery for the luxury retailer Couturelab, says, “paste jewellery tends to be bold, more colourful and less conformist than traditional pieces. That’s what makes it appealing.”

None of the jewellery below is particularly conformist, but all of it speaks particularly clearly of the processes, the chemistry and the engineering, involved. And if it’s largely way beyond the means of most of us—well, thanks to Herr Strass and his lead additives, there’s always paste.

Finally, a Republican with a Clue

15 hours ago

Barbour: GOP needs a ‘proctology exam’

killough.mugshot.4
Posted by

(CNN) – While Republicans continue to soul search after their party’s loss in the presidential election, former Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour injected a new term Wednesday to describe the GOP’s introspection.

“The ground game is really important, and we have to be, I mean we’ve got to give our political organizational activity a very serious…” he said, taking a pause and looking for the right word. “Proctology exam. We need to look everywhere.”

– Follow the Ticker on Twitter: @PoliticalTicker

Speaking at a conference for the Republican Governors Association in Las Vegas, Barbour said his party needs to not only adapt to demographic changes but also reform its messaging.

“We can catch up in four years doing this,” he said. “This isn’t rocket science, but it is hard work that we can’t wait and start in 2016.”

The party needs a “brutally honest assessment of everything we did,” he added. “We need to take everything apart and look at all of it.”

Like other Republicans in recent days, Barbour stressed the importance of being more inclusive to Latinos, African-Americans and other minorities. Barbour in particular chided the party for its tone on illegal immigration, saying many illegal workers contribute to the economy and comprise an important part of society.

“What are we going to do? Send them home? Send five million people home and then try to figure out how to replace them? We need those people to do those jobs,” he said, adding the issue can be resolved “if we’ll just follow good economic policy.”

“But,” he continued, “then we have to follow up with Latinos and show them that we want their vote – not only that we’re for good policy, we want their vote. We need to do the same thing with African-Americans.”

President Barack Obama overwhelmingly won the Latino vote over Mitt Romney, taking 71% of the group. Among African-Americans, the president won 93%, according to CNN exit polls.

Furthermore, the Republican National Committee has stated it will undergo a major review of the party’s performance in 2012.

News on Iran’s Nuclear Plant

Iran’s Nuclear Plant Entering Final Stages?

By Claude Salhani| Tue, 13 November 2012 23:42 | 0

Benefit From the Latest Energy Trends and Investment Opportunities before the mainstream media and investing public are aware they even exist. The Free Oilprice.com Energy Intelligence Report gives you this and much more. Click here to find out more.

Iran’s controversial nuclear power plant at Bushehr is entering its final staging with a series of new tests due to be performed shortly, after which the site is expected to become fully operational by early 2013, according to official government reports from Tehran.

“The preparations for the handover of the power plant by the Russian contractor to Iranian experts will be made in the near future. After various tests and experiments at the Bushehr power plant, we will begin the preliminary launch of the project by Iranian experts between December 21 to February 18,2013,” stated a report from the Mehr news agency.

The agency was quoting Fereydoun Abbasi, director of Iran’s Atomic Energy organization, who addressed reporters at Bushehr last Saturday.

In an earlier statement made last month Valeryi Limarenko, the director general of NIAEP, the agency that manages the construction of the plant for the Russian contractor Atomstroy export said it is possible the plant won’t be handed over to Iranian experts until March next year due to “technical problems,” the agency said. Limarenko said that even after Iran takes control of the plant, some 300 Russian experts would remain at the site to continue assisting Iranian operators of the plant.

Related Article: East Coast Nuclear Power Plants Dodge Hurricane Devastation – For Now

Meanwhile, coinciding with the Iranian report, Britain’s Sunday Times says Israel fears a conventional assault on Iran’s nuclear site may fail to accomplish the job after evidence from unnamed Western defense experts revealed that Tehran has hidden its uranium enrichment capacity deep underground, safe from conventional airstrikes.

Indeed, several reports from Iran obtained by members of Iranian opposition groups inside the country and made available to Western intelligence agencies demonstrates levels of extreme precaution undertaken by Iran to safeguard its facilities from attack. These facilities in Bushehr, as in other locations are buried deep under mountains and are located close to civilian population centers, rendering an attack using nuclear warheads extremely dangerous given the fallout it will have on the nearby residents.

Recent intelligence reports shows Iran is speeding up its uranium enrichment at the Fordow site and has successfully installed 5,000 twin centrifuges, Iranian opposition sources confirmed this report from the Sunday Times in London.

The experts said this limits Israel’s response to two options — either deploying special forces to perpetrate a ground attack or using ballistic missiles carrying tactical nuclear warheads.

Related Article: Boron: A New Nuclear Fuel Which Holds Far More Energy than Originally Thought

Israel, according to several sources, has been practicing bombing raids on mock sites it has erected in the Negev Desert in southern Israel. One US military source who asked not to be named because of the sensitivity of the subject, told Oilprice.com that he had seen “a number of Israeli war planes take off from bases in southern Israel, armed with heavy bombs and return without them.” An indication that Israel may be conducting live fire practice runs.

In either case, an attack using tactical warheads or ground forces would lead to a dangerous escalation of the already explosive situation on the ground in the Middle East.

Iran is highly unlikely to remain quiet to an attack on its nuclear facilities and chances are its reply will not be limited to lodging a complaint at the United Nations Security Council.  The repost from the Islamic Republic could come in a number of ways.

Iran could deploy its proxy forces along Israel’s borders; Lebanon’s Hezbollah militia along Israel’s northern border and Hamas along its southern frontier. Both groups are heavily armed, especially Hezbollah, who comes equipped with all the trimmings of a modern army and whose arsenal included short-range missiles capable of hitting heavily populated civilian areas in the northern part of the country.

Iran could also launch an international retaliatory campaign, stringing at Israeli and Western interested in Europe, Latin America and the Middle East.

The solution to this crisis remains that of the negotiation table and not the battlefield. Before his re-election to a second term at the White House, US President Barack Obama had announced that Iran would be had agreed to initiate talks with the United States. But Iran had agreed to talks in the past only to later renege.

By. Claude Salhani

Claude Salhani, a specialist in conflict resolution, is an independent journalist, political analyst and author of several books on the region. His latest book, ‘Islam Without a Veil,’ is published by Potomac Books. He tweets @claudesalhani.

Cellular Data Network for Inanimate Objects Goes Live in France

Cellular Data Network for Inanimate Objects Goes Live in France
A startup hopes to connect millions of low-power sensors worldwide to the Internet, making everything—from power grids to home appliances—smarter.

By Tom Simonite on November 13, 2012

Why It Matters

A cheap, long-range wireless service could make it far easier to connect devices to the Internet—leading to smarter appliances and infrastructure.

All of the apps, movies, and games consumed on tablets and phones are only available because cellular networks deployed wireless technology to connect people to the Internet wherever they are. French startup SigFox thinks it can help usher in a second mobile Internet boom—by building cellular networks to serve not people but, well, things.

SigFox is focused on connecting cheap sensors and “dumb” home appliances to the Internet. The goal is to make all kinds of appliances and infrastructure, from power grids to microwave ovens, smarter by letting them share data. The general concept, known as “the Internet of Things,” has been discussed in academic circles for years, but it has yet to come to life.

The networks that serve humans are based on technology that isn’t suitable for sensors, says Thomas Nicholls, chief of business development and Internet of Things evangelism at SigFox. “If you compare with a GSM [cell-phone] network, then our solution is much cheaper, provides much lower energy consumption, and operates over a much longer range,” he says.

SigFox builds its networks in the same way as a cellular provider, using a system of connected antennas that each cover a particular area and link back to the operator’s central network. But the antennas use a different radio technology, developed by SigFox, known as ultra narrow band. This technology would not be of much use for streaming video to an iPhone, but it allows devices connecting to the network to consume very little energy, says Nicholls, and it allows for very long-range connections.

SigFox claims that a conventional cellular connection consumes 5,000 microwatts, but a two-way SigFox connection uses just 100. The company also says it is close to rolling out a network to the whole of France—an area larger than California—using just 1,000 antennas. Deployments are beginning in other European countries, and discussions are under way with U.S.-based cellular carriers about teaming up to roll out its technology stateside, says Nicholls. “SigFox can cover the entire U.S. territory with around 10,000 gateways, whereas a traditional cellular network operator needs at least several hundred thousand,” he says. This should make deployment significantly faster, and cheaper.

Further cost savings come from operating the technology on parts of the radio spectrum that are free to use. Cellular networks are operated on licensed spectrum, and as competition for data services has intensified, carriers in the U.S. and elsewhere have spent billions of dollars on such licenses. (SigFox uses 868MHz in Europe and 915MHz in the U.S.; frequencies are often used by cordless phones.) Nicholls says it should be possible for SigFox to offer its service to a connected device for as little as $1 a year.

The features that make SigFox’s network cheap to install and maintain have the downside of limiting the network’s speed. At best, it can currently transfer information at the rate of 100 bits per second; 3G mobile networks move data at least 1,000 times faster. That rules out some visions for the Internet of Things, such as distributing cheap video cameras or microphones across the world. But Nicholls says that his company’s focus is on making it cheap to install Internet-connected sensors.

Craig Foster, an analyst who follows Internet of Things technology for ABI Research, says that it makes sense to create extra networks. “Cellular won’t be feasible in many instances,” he says. “For one, there is not always universal coverage. Think rural smart meters.” Satellite connections or long-range technology solutions like SigFox’s have a better chance at extending the Internet’s reach to remote areas.

SigFox reports seeing most interest in its technology from companies trying to roll out so-called smart grids, an approach to electricity distribution that uses data from sensors throughout a power network—including in customers’ homes—to help improve efficiency and reliability. That tallies with Foster’s experience. “Government stimulus, environmental legislation, and the desire of utilities to increase operational efficiency have been key drivers,” he says.

Nicholls says that projects in other areas are also under way, and that he expects completely new ideas to surface once his company’s network is fully deployed. “We have clients that want to connect with water pipes underground, or monitor parking spaces to detect occupancy and power billing—they just can’t do that with GSM,” he says. A smart parking lot system based on SigFox’s network is coming soon in a “large European country,” he says, and a project in central Africa will use a SigFox network to monitor endangered animals at risk from poachers.

The technology could also find use in home medical devices and gadgets. Wi-Fi has been used for early projects such as Internet-connected bathroom scales and inhalers, but this wireless technology is far from a perfect fit. To save battery life, gadgets don’t keep a Wi-Fi connection active at all times, which can mean waiting a few seconds for a connection to be reestablished before using the device. A device with a SigFox connection could send data instantly, says Nicholls, without any Wi-Fi configuration or network.

2

Mitt Romney Elected President of White Male America

By MAUREEN DOWD
Published: November 10, 2012 403 Comments

WASHINGTON

Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times
Go to Columnist Page »

IT makes sense that Mitt Romney and his advisers are still gobsmacked by the fact that they’re not commandeering the West Wing.

(Though, as “The Daily Show” correspondent John Oliver jested, the White House might have been one of the smaller houses Romney ever lived in.)

Team Romney has every reason to be shellshocked. Its candidate, after all, resoundingly won the election of the country he was wooing.

Mitt Romney is the president of white male America.

Maybe the group can retreat to a man cave in a Whiter House, with mahogany paneling, brown leather Chesterfields, a moose head over the fireplace, an elevator for the presidential limo, and one of those men’s club signs on the phone that reads: “Telephone Tips: ‘Just Left,’ 25 cents; ‘On His Way,’ 50 cents; ‘Not here,’ $1; ‘Who?’ $5.”

In its delusional death spiral, the white male patriarchy was so hard core, so redolent of country clubs and Cadillacs, it made little effort not to alienate women. The election had the largest gender gap in the history of the Gallup poll, with Obama winning the vote of single women by 36 percentage points.

As W.’s former aide Karen Hughes put it in Politico on Friday, “If another Republican man says anything about rape other than it is a horrific, violent crime, I want to personally cut out his tongue.”

Some Republicans conceded they were “a ‘Mad Men’ party in a ‘Modern Family’ world” (although “Mad Men” seems too louche for a candidate who doesn’t drink or smoke and who apparently dated only one woman). They also acknowledged that Romney’s strategists ran a 20th-century campaign against David Plouffe’s 21st-century one.

But the truth is, Romney was an unpalatable candidate. And shocking as it may seem, his strategists weren’t blowing smoke when they said they were going to win; they were just clueless.

Until now, Republicans and Fox News have excelled at conjuring alternate realities. But this time, they made the mistake of believing their fake world actually existed. As Fox’s Megyn Kelly said to Karl Rove on election night, when he argued against calling Ohio for Obama: “Is this just math that you do as a Republican to make yourself feel better?”

Romney and Tea Party loonies dismissed half the country as chattel and moochers who did not belong in their “traditional” America. But the more they insulted the president with birther cracks, the more they tried to force chastity belts on women, and the more they made Hispanics, blacks and gays feel like the help, the more these groups burned to prove that, knitted together, they could give the dead-enders of white male domination the boot.

The election about the economy also sounded the death knell for the Republican culture wars.

Romney was still running in an illusory country where husbands told wives how to vote, and the wives who worked had better get home in time to cook dinner. But in the real country, many wives were urging husbands not to vote for a Brylcreemed boss out of a ’50s boardroom whose party was helping to revive a 50-year-old debate over contraception.

Just like the Bushes before him, Romney tried to portray himself as more American than his Democratic opponent. But America’s gallimaufry wasn’t knuckling under to the gentry this time.

If 2008 was about exalting the One, 2012 was about the disenchanted Democratic base deciding: “We are the Ones we’ve been waiting for.”

Last time, Obama lifted up the base with his message of hope and change; this time the base lifted up Obama, with the hope he will change. He has not led the Obama army to leverage power, so now the army is leading Obama.

When the first African-American president was elected, his supporters expected dramatic changes. But Obama feared that he was such a huge change for the country to digest, it was better if other things remained status quo. Michelle played Laura Petrie, and the president was dawdling on promises. Having Joe Biden blurt out his support for gay marriage forced Obama’s hand.

The president’s record-high rate of deporting illegal immigrants infuriated Latinos. Now, on issues from loosening immigration laws to taxing the rich to gay rights to climate change to legalizing pot, the country has leapt ahead, pulling the sometimes listless and ruminating president by the hand, urging him to hurry up.

More women voted than men. Five women were newly elected to the Senate, and the number of women in the House will increase by at least three. New Hampshire will be the first state to send an all-female delegation to Congress. Live Pink or Dye.

Meanwhile, as Bill Maher said, “all the Republican men who talked about lady parts during the campaign, they all lost.”

The voters anointed a lesbian senator, and three new gay congressmen will make a total of five in January. Plus, three states voted to legalize same-sex marriage. Chad Griffin, the president of the Human Rights Campaign, told The Washington Post’s Ned Martel that gays, whose donations helped offset the Republican “super PACs,” wanted to see an openly gay cabinet secretary and an openly gay ambassador to a G-20 nation.

Bill O’Reilly said Obama’s voters wanted “stuff.” He was right. They want Barry to stop bogarting the change.

New Leonard Cohen Biography

Crazy for Love

‘I’m Your Man,’ Leonard Cohen Bio by Sylvie Simmons

By A. M. HOMES

He is poet and prophet, Buddhist bard “born in a suit,” a wandering Jew ever searching. A man of many generations, Leonard Cohen is still debonair, “looking like a Rat Pack rabbi.” His languorous voice grows deeper year by year as he gets us on his wavelength with recurring themes of love, religion, sex and loss.

Roz Kelly/Michael Ochs Archives — Getty Images

Leonard Cohen, circa 1960.

I’M YOUR MAN

The Life of Leonard Cohen

By Sylvie Simmons

Illustrated. 570 pp. Ecco/HarperCollins Publishers. $27.99.

Related

Leonard Norman Cohen was born in Montreal in 1934, into an upper-middle-class Jewish family. His mother was the daughter of a Talmudic scholar, Rabbi Solomon Klonitzki-Kline, his paternal grandfather, Lyon Cohen, a leader of the Canadian Jewish community. Nathan Cohen, his father, worked in the clothing business and died when his son was 9 years old. Cohen has talked about having had a “messianic” childhood and the strong sense that he was going to do something special, that he would “grow into manhood leading other men.” He was also “well aware that he was a ­Kohen, one of a priestly caste.”

A poet in the 1950s who wrote “Let Us Compare Mythologies” (1956) and a novelist in the 1960s with “The Favorite Game” (1963) and “Beautiful Losers” (1966), Cohen became disappointed with his lack of financial success and moved to the United States to pursue a career as a singer-­songwriter. His first album, “Songs of Leonard Cohen,” was released in 1967 and now, 45 years later, Cohen has put out “Old Ideas,” his 12th studio album, while embarking on a tour that will spin him in circles around Europe and North America.

In 1969 he told The New York Times: “There is no difference between a poem and a song. Some were songs first and some were poems first and some were simultaneous. All of my writing has guitars behind it, even the novels.”

In taking on this artful dodger, Sylvie Simmons, a well-known British rock journalist and the author of biographies of Neil Young and Serge Gainsbourg, bumps up against the inherent difficulty of telling the story of a storyteller. “I’m Your Man” demonstrates that it’s hard to write about a writer whose work is so language- and phrase-specific, so intimate and distant at the same time, perpetually engaged in the dance of seduction.

One reads Simmons’s hefty volume longing for a bit more historical context or counterpoint; Cohen came of age against the backdrop of World War II, the growing sexual revolution, the advent of LSD, and so forth. But once one realizes it is unrealistic to expect the biographer to write with the same gift of voice and precision as the artist, there comes great joy. There is a familiarity to much of Simmons’s material, the sense of being on the inside, as though the reader were sitting at the table during the conversations Simmons reports, and the overall experience is of a thoughtful celebration of the artist’s life.

And, it turns out, she tells us an enormous amount that even I, a Cohen aficionado, didn’t know, including exactly how Jewish Cohen’s upbringing was — he was steeped in Judaism — and that his religious exploration included a brief period as a Scientologist. This detail illuminates the line in Cohen’s song “Famous Blue Rain Coat,” “Did you ever go clear?,” an explicit reference to Scientology that until now was always opaque to me.

It was in London in 1960 that Cohen heard about Hydra, a small Greek island, sunny, warm, a colony of writers, artists and thinkers from around the world. With his inheritance from his grandmother, Cohen bought a house there for $1,500 and began a long relationship with a now celebrated woman called Marianne (Ihlen), not to be confused with the slightly more celebrated muse Suzanne (Verdal), whom he didn’t actually bed — or the second Suzanne (Elrod), the mother of Cohen’s two children, Adam and Lorca.

In the mid-1960s in New York, Cohen met Judy Collins and played her a few songs. She immediately recorded “Dress Rehearsal Rag” and “Suzanne,” and released them on “In My Life” in 1966. A short but fruitful relationship with Joni Mitchell is echoed in Mitchell’s classic songs “Chelsea Morning” and “Rainy Night House,” the second of which makes reference to Mitchell spending the night in Cohen’s mother’s house. Listening to the song again with the knowledge of their relationship adds a newfound resonance. Simmons’s illuminations of Cohen’s artistic cross-pollination give the reader the experience of dipping into cultural ephemera — the kind of extended liner notes that all fans love.

Women play a huge role in Cohen’s life — his need for female affection, along with his difficulty in remaining involved, is the stuff of legend. The biography features some brilliant passages on marriage, Buddhism, therapy and Cohen’s book “Death of a Ladies Man” (1978). In later years, Cohen has frequently quoted a line from his poem “Titles,” which was part of a collection, “Book of Longing”: “My reputation as a ladies’ man was a joke / that caused me to laugh bitterly / through the ten thousand nights / I spent alone.” In the mid-1990s a Swedish interviewer asked Cohen about love. “I had wonderful love, but I did not give back wonderful love,” he said. “I was unable to reply to their love. Because I was obsessed with some fictional sense of separation, I couldn’t touch the thing that was offered me, and it was offered me everywhere.”

Other surprises: Cohen’s decision to add stops at mental hospitals to his 1970 European tour, akin to what Johnny Cash did with prisons; and his persistent experience of war. Cohen was in Cuba at the time of the Bay of Pigs invasion of 1961, and in 1973 he traveled to Jerusalem to sign up on the Israeli side in the Yom Kippur War. He was assigned to a U.S.O.-style entertainer tour in the Sinai Desert and performed for the troops up to eight times a day.

In 1993, Cohen retreated to the Mt. Baldy Zen Center near Los Angeles and in 1996, three years into his stay, he was ordained a Zen Buddhist monk, taking the Dharma name Jikan, meaning a kind of silence. Cohen spent five years at Mt. Baldy, most of it working as the assistant and chauffeur to the Zen master Joshu Sasaki Roshi.

By 2004 Cohen had come down from the mountain and was living in Montreal when, Simmons tells us, he discovered that while he was gone, Kelley Lynch, his business manager and friend, had stolen almost all of his money. Cohen ultimately got a judgment against Lynch, but most of the money could not be recovered. He was broke and forced back on the road, only to find that his fan base had continued to grow and that he’d gone from being a cult hero to an icon, especially in the United States, where there are now multiple generations of Leonard Cohen fans. With his children grown and with children of their own (Cohen became a grandfather for the second time in 2011, when his daughter, Lorca, had a child with the singer ­Rufus Wainwright), it seems that Cohen is ­finally able to allow the love in.

Simmons has deftly narrated Cohen’s evolution, bringing the past into the present and reminding us of the breadth of the journey. “I’m Your Man” is an exhaustive biography, an illumination of an artist who has repeatedly said he’s not much of a self-examiner. Among the book’s side effects is that it sends you back to the source material; as you’re reading, you find yourself craving Cohen’s music in the background. In her interview excerpts, Simmons captures the elliptical nature of ­Cohen’s speech, the wry turns of phrase that are almost like stand-up comedy. Behind it all are a smirk and a wink; you know that Cohen knows how absurd it all is.

And in the end, this biography has the oddest effect: as soon as you finish reading it you feel an overwhelming impulse to go back and begin again, revisiting the story with what you’ve learned along the way. As Leonard Cohen sings in “Anthem”: “Ring the bells that still can ring / Forget your perfect offering / There is a crack in everything / That’s how the light gets in.”

 

Energy Independence for America

U.S. to become biggest oil producer – IEA

By Mark Thompson @CNNMoney November 12, 2012: 9:48 AM Et

Oil and gas boom puts US on track for energy independence

LONDON (CNNMoney) — The United States will overtake Saudi Arabia to become the world’s biggest oil producer before 2020, and will be energy independent 10 years later, according to a new forecast by the International Energy Agency.

The recent resurgence in oil and gas production, and efforts to make the transport sector more efficient, are radically reshaping the nation’s energy market, reported Paris-based IEA in its World Energy Outlook.

North America would become a net exporter of oil around 2030, the global organization said Monday.

“The United States, which currently imports around 20% of its total energy needs, becomes all but self sufficient in net terms — a dramatic reversal of the trend seen in most other energy importing countries,” the IEA stated.

The U.S. is experiencing an oil boom, in large part thanks to high world prices and new technologies, including hydraulic fracking, that have made the extraction of oil and gas from shale rock commercially viable.

From 2008 to 2011, U.S. crude oil production jumped 14%, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Natural gas production is up by about 10% over the same period.

Related: the facts about oil and gas under Obama

According to the IEA, U.S. natural gas prices will rise to $5.5 per million British thermal units (MBtu) in 2020, from around $3.5 per MBtu this year, driven by rising domestic demand rather than a forecast increase in exports to Asia and other markets.

“In our projections, 93% of the natural gas produced in the United States remains available to meet domestic demand,” it said. “Exports on the scale that we project would not play a large role in domestic price setting.”

North America’s new role in the world energy markets will accelerate a change in the direction of international oil trade toward Asia, and underscore the importance of securing supply routes from the Middle East to China and India.

The IEA said it expects global energy demand to increase by more than a third by 2035, with China, India and the Middle East accounting for 60% of the growth, and more than outweighing reduced demand in developed economies.

That will push world average oil import prices up to $125 per barrel (in 2011 dollars) by 2035, from around $100 per barrel at present, but they could be much higher if Iraq fails to deliver on its production potential.

Iraq is set to become the second largest oil exporter by the 2030s, as it expands output to take advantage of demand from fast growing Asian economies.

Related: Iraq oil output to double by 2020

New fuel economy standards in the U.S. and efforts by China, Japan and the European Union to reduce demand would help to make up for a disappointing decade for global energy efficiency.

“But even with these and other new policies in place, a significant share of the potential to improve energy efficiency — four-fifths of the potential in the buildings sector and more than half in industry — still remains untapped,” the IEA stated.

Policymakers are still missing out on potential benefits for energy security, economic growth and the environment.

Growth in demand over the years to 2035 would be halved and oil demand would peak just before 2020, if governments took action to remove barriers preventing the implementation of energy efficiency measures that are already economically viable, the global organization said. To top of page

Agave Plant

I took this photo a while back.  This particular Agave is thriving in the dry climate of Austin, Texas.

Congress and the FBI Should Get Their Own Houses in Order Before Going After a Real Patriot

By JOSH MITCHELL And JESSICA HOLZER

Washington—The top Senate Democrat on intelligence issues said Sunday she would investigate the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s handling of the inquiry into Central Intelligence Agency chief David Petraeus, including why top lawmakers weren’t informed of the investigation before it became public.

Associated PressDavid Petraeus, shown in September, resigned as CIA chief suddenly on Friday, saying he had an extramarital affair.

CIA Director David Petraeus resigned as head of the intelligence agency, saying he “showed extremely poor judgment” by engaging in an extramarital affair. Neil King has details on The News Hub. Photo: AFP/Getty Images.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D., Calif.), the chairwoman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, said on “Fox News Sunday” that she learned of the Petraeus investigation on Friday when her staff began getting press inquiries on the matter. She said she and other committee leaders are routinely made aware of investigations involving national security issues prior to them becoming public.

“We received no advance notice” of the inquiry involving Mr. Petraeus, said Sen. Feinstein. “It was like a lightning bolt.” She later added: “This is something that could have had an effect on national security. I think we should have been told.”

The Petraeus matter, stemming from an extramarital affair that led to his resignation, will be taken up during a previously scheduled hearing before her committee this week, she said. The hearing will focus on the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya.

Felled by Scandal

There is a long list of leaders felled by allegations of personal or ethical lapses in recent years, including the CIA’s David Petraeus and Lockheed Martin’s Christopher Kubasik.

Sen. Feinstein said her committee may ask Mr. Petraeus to testify before Congress. Sen. Feinstein also dismissed speculation that Mr. Petraeus’s investigation was linked to fallout from the Libya attack.

Meanwhile, House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Peter King (R., N.Y.) called for an investigation into whether the FBI took too long to disclose its findings to the National Security Council and President Barack Obama.

“It just doesn’t add up, the whole time line here,” Mr. King, who also serves on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, said Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union” program. “The president should have been informed at the earliest point.”

Mr. Petraeus stepped down suddenly on Friday, saying he had an extramarital affair. The affair was discovered by the FBI during an investigation into potentially harassing emails sent by a woman romantically linked to Mr. Petraeus to a second woman, according to people familiar with the matter.

The FBI and prosecutors in North Carolina and Florida began their investigation last spring. Initially, they looked at the possibility that someone had hacked into Mr. Petraeus’s emails but later determined no cyber-breach had occurred.

The FBI and Justice Department informed the Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, of their findings early last week. Mr. Clapper informed Obama administration officials on Wednesday.

Music of Science

The Music of Science: Oliver Morton takes one mathematician and some tiles—and brings Plato’s forms down to earth…

From INTELLIGENT LIFE magazine, November/December 2012

Almost a quarter of a century ago, I was sitting outside the Turf Tavern in Oxford. It was a sunny late-summer day. I was a young reporter and with me, drinking a half-pint of cider, was Roger Penrose, the greatest British mathematician of his generation to apply himself to physics.

Until that drink, Plato’s notion of a pure world of form to which the world perceived by humans was but a shadow was just something I had come across in books. It was familiar intellectual history, but hardly something I would expect anyone actually to believe. By the time our glasses were empty I knew that, at least to Penrose, it was an irreducible reality. The platonic world of pure form was not just as real to him as the cool gold of his drink or the sounds of my stammered questions. It was more real. For all the sunlight, I was a shadow.

The conversation in which I realised that Penrose, sincerely and without insanity, truly believed in a profoundly different and yet accessible world, was about one of the more intriguing of his many mathematical contributions: the tiles that bear his name. As I type, my wife is designing a pattern for square tiles in our kitchen. Because the tiles are square, she could choose a pattern that has fourfold symmetry—you could turn it round and every quarter turn it would look the same. With triangular tiles it is possible to create similar symmetries that are threefold. Twofold and sixfold are also possible. But there is no single shape of tile with which you can create a fivefold symmetry.

In the 1970s, Penrose found that you could, however, produce a set of tiles—now called Penrose tiles—which, used together, would cover a surface perfectly and show a fivefold symmetry. It was an odd symmetry (you couldn’t get the pattern to repeat simply by moving a step or two in a given direction, as you can with square or triangular tiles) with intriguing new mathematical properties, and if it seemed more like a divertissement than a discovery, it’s worth remembering that in maths the two can be quite close. But in the early 1980s an Israeli chemist, Dan Schechtman, found that some materials he had made for study seemed to be showing just such a peculiar symmetry, behaving like “quasicrystals”. A few years later a researcher in Japan, An-Pan Tsai, produced further evidence that such things were real.

Hundreds of quasicrystalline solids have now been made in the lab, and they have been incorporated into some products. But they have seemed vanishingly rare in nature. Regular crystals, the equivalent of patterns in square or triangular tiles, abound, from sea-salt to snowflakes; the laws of thermodynamics encourage such patterns of growth. Natural quasicrystals were unknown. Did that mean that they only formed under precisely tuned conditions? Or did it mean people were not looking hard enough?

The latest evidence suggests that the problem was in part the latter. Paul Steinhardt, who had been interested in the possibility of quasicrystals even before Schechtman’s work, inspired a systematic attempt to look at all plausible candidates in the world’s mineralogy collections—and a few years ago a sample emerged from a museum in Florence that turned out to be almost identical to a creation of Dr Tsai’s. But the sample, originally collected in Siberia, had various other attributes that were hard to explain on the basis of normal mineralogy. Did it come from peculiarly deep in the earth? From a lightning strike? From an aluminium smelter’s slag pile?

The answer is no, every time. It now appears that, like kryptonite, the quasicrystalline mineral came from outer space. Hints to this effect could be found in the sample itself, and an expedition back to Siberia led by Dr Steinhardt has provided further evidence that the sample came from a meteorite. The expedition also furnished its participants with new samples both of the original quasicrystalline mineral and of some other stuff not yet described in the scientific literature.

In an odd way, this unearthly origin makes quasicrystals more normal. It now seems they probably can grow on their own, through well-established thermodynamic principles, in something like the way everyday crystals do. They just don’t happen to do so under the conditions that are typically available for making minerals in the crust of the Earth. If we expand our purview to take in the conditions of the cloud of dust and gas in which the sun first took fire—the scene of the birth of many meteorites—the right conditions turn up and so do quasicrystals.

The difference between the conditions of a planet and a condensing pre-stellar dust cloud may seem to make them different worlds. But those differences are, at heart, parochial, compared with the fundamental rules of nature’s order and symmetries. Space and Earth are just different places.

To find something from a truly different world, you have to think like Roger Penrose. If you do, then you will find the evidence for that other world not at the end of long treks across Siberia nor down a mineralogist’s microscope, but in the recesses of your own thought. And from that world of form, all of this one—minerals, meteorites, the warmth of sun on sandstone and the cold of space before the sun—is of a piece.

Oliver Morton is briefings editor of The Economist and author of “Eating the Sun”. He is a former editor of Wired (UK) and features editor of Nature

Illustration Gary Taxali

IDEAS  OLIVER MORTON  INTELLIGENCE  NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2012  SCIENCE  THE MUSIC OF SCIENCE
ARTICLE TOOLS
Email this page Printer-friendly version  Delicious  StumbleUpon  Facebook