New Pipeline to Change Canada’s Energy Future

From Oil Price.com

Trans Mountain Pipeline Could Change Canada’s Energy Future

By James Burgess | Mon, 06 August 2012 21:52 | 1

Forget the Keystone XL, or Northern Gateway pipelines. The pipeline that really could change Canada’s energy industry is the Trans Mountain pipeline.

Currently the Trans Mountain carries oil across the Rockies to the Kinder Morgan-owned Westridge Terminal in Vancouver. There it is loaded onto a tanker, once every week, and shipped off around the world, actually the tankers generally head off down to L.A.’s Long Beach.

Kinder Morgan now intends to more than double the capacity of the pipeline, up to 750,000 barrels a day, and see a tanker full of crude leave Vancouver port almost everyday. Using tankers will allow Canada to deliver oil to almost any nation in the world, and sell the product at global prices, rather than be stuck selling the majority of the oil to the oversupplied US at a discount. Most of the oil will probably still be sent to California, but that doesn’t matter because oil is sold at the dock, which means that as soon as it leaves Vancouver, the Canadian oil company will already have been paid at the international price, regardless of the ultimate destination of the oil.

Expanding the Trans Mountain line could also see an expansion to the oil sands which will allow for years of growth, and could turn Vancouver into a major oil tanker hub.

The Trans Mountain expansion is already receiving similar opposition that met Enbridge’s plans to build the Northern Gateway, even though the project has not yet been formally announced. The announcement is expected next year.

Another block that may hinder this plan is the treatment that oil tankers receive in Vancouver. Regulations state that they can only sail during the day, at high slack water, a window that sometimes only lasts for 25 minutes. They must also travel through clearly defined channels which means other ships must wait. Without some reformation these strict rules will restrict the volume of crude that can be shipped out of Vancouver, regardless of the amount arriving in the new pipeline.

By. James Burgess of Oilprice.com

Lord of the Meadow

Our local bull elk with one of the girls.  In about a month and a half the action will be picking up in this meadow.

So This is What Mars Looks Like – from the Atlantic Wire

So This Is What Mars Looks Like

NASA

Today NASA released Curiosity’s first color image of the Martian landscape, and well, we guess that’s what $2.5 billion gets you. In all serious—and Instagram jokes aside—it’s actually pretty cool (for anyone who has ever wanted to know what the Martian landscape looks like). As NASA explains, what you’re looking at is the north wall and rim of the Gale Crater taken by the Mars Hand Lens Imager (aka, MAHLI). But perhaps more importantly, there’s reason to believe that the photo quality will get better. “The image is murky because the MAHLI’s removable dust cover is apparently coated with dust blown onto the camera during the rover’s terminal descent. Images taken without the dust cover in place are expected during checkout of the robotic arm in coming weeks.” writes NASA.

 Hopefully more pictures will be released

Community Lake House – Evergreen, CO

Evergreen Lake is located in the center of Evergreen, CO.  It serves as the focal point for many community activities and draws a lot of tourists to the area.  Activities include canoeing, paddle boating, ice fishing, ice skating and hiking and fishing.  The structure shown in this post serves as an activity center for parties and events such as a jazz festival and art and craft markets.  This is a great place to visit if you are in the area.

Russian Computer Guru – from Technology Rev

In the Olympics of Algorithms, a Russian Keeps Winning Gold

Google’s Petr Mitrichev is the all-time champion of competitive programming, a little-known sport where tech giants scout for talent.

3 comments

TOM SIMONITE

Monday, August 6, 2012

Wired in: Top-ranked programmer Petr Mitrichev solves a problem during a 2010 coding competition.
John Morris Photography | TopCoder, Inc.

If Vladimir Putin glances out the windows of the Kremlin window at just the right moment, he has a chance of glimpsing the world’s best computer programmer in Google’s Moscow office across the river.

He is Petr Mitrichev, a 27-year-old Russian who works on Google’s search engine and earned his champion’s title in competitive programming, a sport where hackers write computer code in pursuit of cash prizes, travel opportunities, and a deep fulfillment unattainable anywhere else.

“You have a feeling of satisfaction in a contest when you solve a problem,” says Mitrichev, affable and a little pale in a Google T-shirt during an interview on the lawn of the company’s headquarters in Mountain View, California.

Since 2005, Mitrichev, a graduate of Moscow State University, has led the globe in algorithmic programming. That’s the Grand Prix of competitive coding categories, in which riddles involving infinite game boards or the decibel level of n + 1 mooing cows require instant mathematical insights and quick fingers on the keyboard. Mitrichev is known for his “short pause”—that is, he starts to answer questions nearly as soon as he sees them.

To Mitrichev, competitive programming offers a rare island of absolutes in a subjective world. “The beautiful aspect is that it’s totally automatic and there is no human judgment involved at all,” he says. “It’s one of the fairest competitions I’ve ever seen.”

Not only algorithm crafters such as Mitrichev see beauty in that. Technology companies use the sport programming scene as a place to discover the world’s smartest—and fastest—coders. Giants such as Facebook and Google sponsor the top competitions, plastering their logos around event halls like Rolex at Wimbledon (see “Letting Hackers Compete, Facebook Eyes New Talent”).

Mitrichev’s rise began when he was 10, after he picked up a book belonging to his older brother about the computer language Pascal. Although there was no computer in his Moscow home, the next year he placed 60th out of 100 in Russia’s national programming competition for high-school students. Since he was only 11, the judges awarded the youngster a computer. At 15, he won the competition outright. Soon after, he was on the international circuit, making his debut at the International Olympiad in Informatics in Beijing.

Mitrichev earned his current world ranking only after joining the premier leagues of competitive programming, a series of weekly and annual contests run by the Connecticut company TopCoder that attract more than 400,000 programmers from around the world. Switching programming languages from Pascal to C#, he surged up the rankings to take over first place in 2005, a position he still holds today.

Such mastery and a sporting demeanor have made Mitrichev a geek hero. Forum posts dissect his every performance, which he posts as videos online. At the larger, annual contest that convenes hundreds of coders in a hotel ballroom, large screens relay live feeds from the competitors’ monitors. Chairs are drawn up 20 minutes early for a good view of Mitrichev at work.

“Murmurs go through the crowd when they see that he has a bug, and again when they see that he’s fixed it,” says Mike Lydon, TopCoder’s CTO. “To the layperson there’s nothing to see. But to these guys this is fascinating.”

The problems in these competitions often outline physical situations that must be described mathematically. Doing that requires writing an algorithm—a sequence of operations to be performed on data. One of the problems in Mitrichev’s most recent competition, on July 21, was to predict the position of pieces in a checkers game played on an infinite board. Competitors win points when their programs correctly handle test data. Some contests include a challenge phase, where the goal is to submit data that trips a competitor’s program.

There is significant money at stake in the sport. Top prizes can be worth $25,000 (Mitrichev has won several), and because algorithms drive lucrative businesses in Silicon Valley and on Wall Street, many top coders are recruited into high-paying jobs. (A Google PR representative would not let Mitrichev discuss his compensation.)

Mitrichev is unusual because he has continued to compete—and to win—even after getting such a job: he started work at Google in 2007. He says he keeps competing because writing code is relaxing. TopCoder’s weekly online competitions take roughly 90 minutes. “You can watch a TV show or you could enter,” he says.

Even at leisure, Mitrichev is a force to be reckoned with. In 2011 he won Facebook’s first programming contest, the now annual Hacker Cup. He showed up for the final at Facebook’s headquarters and collected his trophy with his Google employee badge attached to his jeans. Some saw it as a brazen taunt in the companies’ rivalry for hacker supremacy. “I just had left it on from the day before,” says Mitrichev. “I was not trying to make any point.”

Mitrichev’s job at Google is to improve its search tool, built from perhaps the most finely tuned and valuable algorithms in history, which registers nearly five billion requests a day. That’s difficult, he says, because most of the easy techniques have already been implemented, including in PageRank, the iconic algorithm originally written by Google’s founders. Improving search results now involves more subtle tweaks, such as finding synonyms or other language tricks to help extract extra meaning from a user’s search terms.

“When you have an idea, then you implement it as an algorithm, and then you run an experiment,” he explains. If search rankings come out better—if people click the top results more often in live tests—the new algorithm stays.

Next time a Google search returns exactly the result you wanted, you can judge for yourself.

Where Guns Go

Where Guns Go: A Visual History of a Global Trade

Google Chrome Experiments
SERENA DAI10:15 AM ET

In all the talk of gun control, people like to throw around about America’s heavy arms trade. Want to know what it actually looks like? Google has an in-depth interactive showing a history of the legal small arms trade.

Google’s Ideas team collaborated with the Igarape Institute to make the visualization, which only tracks small arms. They used data from 1992-2010 about the legal arms trade from the Peace Research Institute Oslo, according to Google’s blog.

In the interactive, you can toggle between years at the sliding bar right below the globe. The arched lines connecting arms trades between countries will appear thicker or thinner based on the amount of trade, with orange lines representing military weapons and ammo and blue lines representing civilian weapons and ammo. As you can see, the United States has thick ties to Europe’s arms trade.

You can also see just military imports/exports or just civilian ones using boxes on the lower right of the interactive. A graph below the globe–shown by clicking the graph button–shows general trends in imports and exports. One interesting find: Graphical difference between military weapon imports to the United States versus civilian weapon imports. While military imports to the U.S. have gone up and down a bit sporadically in the past decade, civilian weapon imports have had a clear upward climb.

Robert Muggah, a research principal at Igarape Institute, explained in a video that the data is important because even the illegal gun trade starts with legal transactions. In turn, the legal trade affects violence. “What I’ve found is that a majority of people are being killed not by bombs but by guns and bullets.”

Explore the interactive here.

Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments or send an email to the author atsdai@theatlantic.com. You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.
Serena Dai

Bicycle in Downtown Austin

I took this picture in Austin a while back.  I converted the file to grayscale and used the pencil sketches artistic filter in Photoshop CS5 artistic filters folder.

Google Moving Fast on Broadband – from Guardian Tech

Google moves fast on broadband revolution

While Britain makes vague noises about having a ‘world-class’ broadband network, Google is delivering genuinely superfast speed at knock-down prices in the US

Larry Page of Google

Google’s Larry Page: forging into superfast broadband. Photograph: Chris Hondros/Getty Images

document has come into my possession. It appears to emanate from the government of Ruritania or some other insignificant country. The cover is illustrated by a low-resolution smartphone photograph of an out-of-focus bedspread, but this homely imagery is offset by the brave rhetoric inside.

“We should have the best superfast broadband network in Europe by 2015,” it declares. “That’s a challenging goal but it’s one that we can and must achieve. It’s vital for the growth of the economy – especially to small businesses that are so often the engines of innovation.”

Quite so. The government of Ruritania is “committed to ensuring the rapid rollout of superfast broadband across the country. Rural and remote areas of the country should benefit from this infrastructure upgrade at the same time as more populated areas, ensuring that an acceptable level of broadband is delivered to those parts of the country that are currently excluded.” It is also believed something called “two-way video conferencing” may encourage Ruritarians to work from home.

There is much more in this vein, together with talk of “a world-class communications network” that will help the economy grow. Consumers will have “even greater choice” and costs will be reduced. The delivery of public services will be more efficient and cost-effective. And of course “the way we access entertainment will alter, with greater options for consumers”.

Note the use of “superfast” and “world class”, which are usually reliable indicators of either cant or cluelessness. Working on the assumption that the governors of Ruritania (who sign themselves J Hunt and E Vaizey, by the way) are honest but simple folks, we delve deeper into their vapourings in search of a definition of “superfast”. On this, they are strangely evasive, but essentially they appear to mean broadband speeds ranging from 2Mbps (megabits per second) – which is marginally better than smoke signals but will be available to even the humblest yokel in the land – to as much as perhaps 100Mbps in favoured urban locations, in which frappuccinos and other delicacies are available. If such heights can be attained by 2015, the aforementioned governors assure their readers that Ruritania will lead Europe.

All of which makes this columnist wonder what these guys have been smoking. Or perhaps it is just a reflection of the fact that Ruritania is a remote and backward country that has poor communications with the outside world. If the latter, then perhaps it would be helpful to tell Messrs Hunt and Vaizey something about what life is like far from their distant fastnesses. In Kansas and Missouri, for example.

Both of these US states have cities called Kansas City and in both of them Google is signing up customers for what any informed person would call real broadband, namely a connection running at 1,000Mbps. It uses fibre-optic cables to give gigabit (1,000Mbps) connection speeds to subscribers. For $70 a month on a 12-month contract, Google promises them up to 1,000Mbps upload and download speeds, plus a terabyte (1,000 gigabytes) of free online storage. Alternatively, for a one-off $300 connection fee, Google offers them 5Mbps download and 1Mbps upload free for seven years.

A promotional video for Google Fiber.Since Google is not a registered charity, you may ask why it’s doing this. The first reason is simply that it can, because ever since the collapse of the first internet boom, Google has been acquiring, at knockdown prices, the bandwidth capacity (the “dark fibre”) installed by the telephone companies at the height of the bubble. (This also explains why the company can absorb the colossal bandwidth requirements of YouTube without missing a beat.)

The second reason for the Kansas City projects is that, under its new chief executive, Larry Page, Google appears to have acquired a new appetite for radical strategic moves. Page knows that once consumers have access to real – as opposed to Ruritanian – broadband then their behaviour changes radically. Not only do they spend more time online (which obviously benefits Google), but they also use the net for nearly everything, which also benefits Google and is why phone companies, cable TV firms, broadcasters, publishers and their captive regulators fear the internet. If Google Fiber (as they call it in the US) catches on, then a swath of powerful industries is in for a very rocky ride.

And – who knows? – one day news of these developments may reach the rulers of Ruritania. Provided that they manage to get their “superfast” connections up and running.

Outdoor Art at Evergreen Lake

This is a new piece of art near Evergreen Lake.  I am surprised that there is no signage providing its provenance.

Monopoly With Extra Pace

MONOPOLY WITH EXTRA PACE

MonopolyDeal_Cards.jpg 

A Game, a Gadget and an App: Tom Standage finds a 10-minute version of the property game. Plus a personal trainer on your wrist…

From INTELLIGENT LIFE magazine, July/August 2012

GAME Monopoly deal
Playing Monopoly is tedious. Hours of crawling around the board, amassing houses and cash, in anticipation of a dramatic showdown that may never come—how many games are paused, never to be resumed? Monopoly Deal, by contrast, takes the best elements of Monopoly and turns them into a pacey card game. There’s no rolling dice and passing Go, no making change, no board and no jail. Instead there are sudden reversals, surprise moves and plenty of scope for deception. Special cards let you steal and swap properties, demand outlandish rents or (best of all) “Just say no” to neutralise an opponent’s move, but the whole thing still feels familiar. Crucially, each game lasts only 10-15 minutes, so you end up playing several rounds and exacting revenge on those who bankrupted you last time. On a rainy weekend this game will have everyone ditching their electronic gizmos for one more round – it’s that good. Clever design allows children and adults to play as equals. But be warned: you may be shocked at how devious your children can be.
Monopoly Deal by Hasbro, about £10

GADGET Nike FuelBand
The FuelBand feels as if it has fallen out of the future. A black, rubbery wristband, it contains motion detectors that track its wearer’s activity around the clock. Press its single button and a magical embedded display comes to life, showing the time, steps taken, calories burned and Nike’s proprietary “Fuel” score. The idea is that you set a target score for each day and then try to beat it, turning exercise into a game. To raise the stakes, the FuelBand syncs with a smartphone app and a website, so you can see how you compare against other users. Unlike Nike’s previous glorified pedometers, it’s not just aimed at sporty types. By turning the daily trudge to the station into a fitness game, it will appeal to a far wider audience of people who worry that they ought to be doing more exercise—and who will find themselves getting off the train a stop early to boost their score. Very clever, Nike.
Nike FuelBand £139

APP Frankenstein
Is it a book, a game or an elaborate updating of the “choose your own adventure” genre? This retelling by Dave Morris of Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein” combines all three, and more artfully than the title might suggest. Text scrolls up the screen, with the story gently pushed along by your choices and responses, quickly drawing you in. Like the original, the tale is told from several perspectives, though it has been relocated to revolution-era France. The typography and illustrations, presented as if on sliding sheets of old paper, are gorgeous, especially on the pin-sharp display of the latest iPad. As authors, publishers and readers grapple with the possibilities presented by tablet computers, “Frankenstein” is an impressive and entirely new kind of e-book.
Frankenstein (Profile) for iPad and iPhone, £2.99/$4.99

Tom Standage is digital editor of The Economist and author of “An Edible History of Humanity”